Psychology of collecting

“For people who collect, the value of their collections are not monetary but emotional. The collections allow people to relive their childhood, connect themselves to a period or to a time they feel strongly about. Their collections help them ease insecurity and anxiety about losing a part of themselves and to keep the past to continue to exist in the present.[1] Some collect for the thrill of the hunt. For these collectors, collecting is a quest, a lifelong pursuit which can never be completed.[2] Collecting may provide psychological security by filling a part of the self one feels is missing or is void of meaning.[3] When one collects, one experiments with arranging, organizing, and presenting a part of the world which may serve to provide a safety zone, a place of refuge where fears are calmed and insecurity is managed.[4] Motives are not mutually exclusive, rather, different motives combine for each collector for a multitude of reasons.”

The above is an except from the Wikipedia Article, “The Psychology of Collecting.” I feel it is healthy to reflect on our nature and what drives us. I’ve often thought about doing more research into other collecting hobbies to look for other collectors’ perspectives on collecting. Collecting in general is fairly fascinating to me, and I’ve always wondered what information we could share with fellow collectors that bridge the gaps of our specific fields of expertise. If you have any resources or recommended reading to share, please do!

Rant: "Auction!"

Does anyone else get fairly annoyed when someone shares some really cool cards (or any cards for that matter) from their collection and they get bombarded with comments asking for auctions or to sell their cards? It just seems like really rude behavior to me. I'm talking about the posts that aren't ambiguous about the intent that it's a sharing post (sometimes they're even labeled NFS).

The major problem with this behavior is how much it dis-incentivizes collectors from sharing really cool things. I believe that the collector who made that awesome Japanese website, The House of Errors, stopped updating because they were tired of people bugging them to buy their cards.

“But Jason, If I didn’t ask if a card was for sale or not I would have never acquired such and such card!” Now, it's not like I've never inquired if a card from someone's collection was for sale or not, but I think it's really important HOW you ask. For starters, use whole fucking sentences. Don’t be a yappy dog. If there are other yappy dogs, don’t step right up and join the yapping. Instead say something like, “If you ever plan to sell this I would also be interested.” Just show a little bit of respect. Tell them how awesome you think the card is and thank them for sharing. Let them know that you appreciate their collection. It’ll go a long way towards making the community a healthier place and you may even end up with cards that you never expected to own.


Give me your thoughts. Have you ever been on the receiving end? Have you fallen into the rudeness trap and are now repenting your ways? Or maybe you disagree with me entirely? I’m really looking forward to talking about this more. Thanks for reading!

Learn from my mistakes: Burned by NFCs Thrice

It may come to you as no surprise to you that I am anti-NFC. I try my best to remain neutral and informative in my articles, but I have publicly spoken/written on several occasions about the MASSIVE negative impacts that they have on the hobby I love. What I haven’t written about are the times where NFCs have directly impacted me. I share with you these three stories with the hope that you can learn from my mistakes. To this date, NFCs have cost me approximately $1,700 in purchases/trades that I otherwise wouldn’t have made. Expensive lessons to learn…

The first time:

The year is 2014. Jason is a young misprint collector. He’s got a modest collection, but is still relatively new to the hobby. Back then I (yes, I just switched from 3rd to 1st person) had parts of my collection posted on my tumblr blog. I had been part of the misprints and rarities FB group for maybe a year or less at that point. I was approached by a fellow collector, and asked if I owned this card:


A friend of his collected earthbinds, and he wanted to get this for him. I was proposed a simple trade.

This card (on the right) for my FBB earthbind. At the time, it seemed like a perfectly fair trade. I was getting a similar miscut and I was helping someone get a card for their friend! At that time, I clearly didn’t know any better. I got the card, and despite the little bit of edge/corner wear, I was pretty happy with it…Until I learned what NFC was. Full disclosure, I did not handle the situation well after the fact. I’m not proud of my demeanor or how I went about resolving the situation. I let my emotions get the better of me. Despite all of that, we did come to a resolution. I wasn’t able to get my earthbind back. It was sent out to the friend, and it was gone. I did end up trading the NFC back for an agreed upon value. It wasn’t enough to cover the cost of eventually replacing the FBB Gutter Cut in my collection though. I came out at a net loss.


I learned a few things from this incident (some of which I won’t go into). The first being: DO YOUR HOMEWORK. Arguably, I didn’t fully grasp this lesson (see the 2nd time), but it certainly gave me a kick in the butt. The second is: Don’t be afraid to ask for more information (crap…I didn’t learn this one either). People have no way of knowing what you know and what you don’t know. The more questions you ask about a specific item, the more you’ll learn. Most people have no issue being up front & honest when it comes to providing answers. Most people are fair and honest. The best defense against the ones that aren’t is being informed. Develop a network of trustworthy friends who you can go to for 2nd opinions if you need to (I’ll do my best to always help). I was lucky enough that I traded with someone who had a solid set of morals, and was willing to work with me to make things right. I’ve been close friends with that individual ever since, and for that, I’m almost glad that this happened. <3

The second time:

This story is much less exciting than the first. I’ll just start off with the lessons learned because that’s the most relevant thing here. Don’t assume that a card you’re purchasing isn’t NFC because of who you’re purchasing it from. I made this assumption, and I bought a card for a lot more than I’d otherwise be willing to (which is at all). I assumed the card was legitimate (aka not an altered rarity), and didn’t ask questions or do an adequate amount of research because of that. Huge mistake. The seller was entirely willing to let me return the card for full price (the misprint community is seriously fucking awesome btw. I love you guys), but I declined. I made a deal and I stick to my word. I kept the card as a reminder (a much needed one apparently) to always do your homework and to never assume. Another expensive lesson.


The third time: Unfortunately, probably not the last…

This story is by far the saddest and most troubling story of the three. It’s the most painful lesson I’ve experienced (both financially and emotionally) in my 11 years of collecting misprints. I’ve come very close to quitting this hobby in the past. This was another instance where that almost happened. I’ve cooled off quite a bit since, but this wound is still very fresh.

I was contacted by a member of the misprint group regarding information they received about a card which was posted, this card was in fact NFC. I put on my detective hat, and got to work. I found myself talking to the gentleman who’s directly responsible for creating a significant amount of NFCs. It was a really pleasant conversation, and he was super helpful. Based on that conversation, I don’t believe that the card I was messaged about was NFC, despite his (the choppa’s) claim that he thinks it was his work. I don’t think he looked closely enough at the photo, which wasn’t the greatest anyways.

During our conversation, the choppa brought up an interaction he had in the group in the past. He mentioned a specific type of miscut and the argument that he’d gotten into when he tried to inform folks that they were NFC. The unsolicited anecdote immediately triggered horror as I knew for certain that I owned some of the cards he was talking about. I sent him a photo, and my fears were confirmed. “Yes. I did those ones in the picture, I remember the skull one.”

If you’re not familiar with the above miscuts, know that they have inverted backs. That is something that cannot be replicated outside of the factory. This only added to the perception of their authenticity. The uncut sheet that these came from, was a scrap sheet from internal factory sources. It was AFTER that sheet left the factory, when someone decided to cut it up and sell it for profit. We’re still trying to trace the full ownership history, but at some point, they were either misrepresented as factory cut cards, or that information was omitted because it was never inquired about. The individual who I bought them from was not aware and is as much as a victim as I am. NFCs like these, the ones that pretend to be something they’re not, are the most disgusting and vile NFCs out there. These are the fillers and test prints that are cut normally. These are the cards where delicate provenance gets lost, and someone suffers because of it. These are the NFCs that do the most, unrecoverable damage to our beloved hobby.

So what’s the lesson to be learned here? Unlike my first two stories this wasn’t really an avoidable situation. I think that the lesson might be this: There has been, and will forever be a risk of this happening to anyone with almost any card within the hobby. Cards that you own that you thought are legitimate, might not be. That’s the new (ok…NFCs have been around as long as Magic) and difficult reality we must swallow as collectors. This inherit risk, is now forever present in our hobby. To get really cool cards, we have no choice but to accept that risk. Knowing that these are NFC, is just another sad day for misprints.

I hope that these stories help you. I hope that you can learn from my mistakes. I think we need to share these stories more with one another. I’d like to open the floor for anyone who would like to share. Feel free to use the comments, send me an email, or even PM me on facebook! Thank you for reading. Stay awesome!

The Stuff I'm looking for!

All collectors have a wishlist of some sort. I figured that it’d be neat to let you guys know what my current collecting priorities are! Some of these items I know where to find, but just haven’t gotten around to saving up and purchasing them yet. Others I have no clue where to find so any leads would be appreciated! You can click on each image for more information!

High Priority:

The Epically Difficult Stuff:

These are the cards that I want, but don’t expect to be able to obtain. Every once in a while I get lucky though!

Lower Priority Stuff:

I’ll pick these up if the price is right or I haven’t bought something in a while!

Managing Frustrations

One of my primary motivators for building this website (the original version was a Tumblr blog) was frustration.  The frustration stemmed from the sheer amount of repeated questions that we would see over and over again within the misprint community.  All of the answers were so basic!  Why couldn't people understand?  My thoughts were that if I could build an easy to understand beginner's guide then we wouldn't repeatedly see all the same newb questions and as a result, less frustration!  Wishful thinking eh?

As admins of the Misprints and Rarities Facebook Group, my compatriots and I have put a considerable amount of time and energy into both directly helping folks out as well as creating resources for them to help themselves.  Other prominent and active members of the community have done the same.  Despite our best efforts, there is still a steady stream of people who think a card shifted 1mm is miscut, can't identify NFC (or even know what it means), or wonder why their foil cutline wasn't approved.  Can't you see it?  It's right there in the group rules!  Why are you emailing me about your 'miscut' that's not even off-centered?  I covered that in the beginner's guide!  UGH!

Image from:&nbsp;

Image from:

Is it laziness?  Is it ignorance?  Is is plain stupidity?  Worse yet, did I not explain it correctly?  Could I have made it easier to understand?  Is my expertise bias clouding my perspective?  It's probably all of the above and then some.  Knowing that doesn't seem to help the frustration though!  As passionate collectors, there's only so much we can take!  RAAAGGGEEEEE!  FRUSTRATION!  SMASH FACE ON DESK!...ok sorry.  Got a bit carried away there.

Like it or not, frustration is a natural reaction.  I don't know if anyone in the misprint community has reached a level of zen where they don't get at least a little bit bothered when someone asks a question that was answered 2 comments up in a thread or gets angry at YOU for declining their post even though it's clearly laid out in the rules.  I'm sure you get the point now.  I'll stop kicking this horse with this segue;  What we do with that frustration is IMPORTANT.


The misprint community has a variety of reputations, not all of which are overwhelmingly positive.  I'd like to say the the frustration is the cause, but the reality of it is how fellow community members let that frustration influence their actions.  It may not seem like it, but even being a little bit of a jerk has consequences for the misprint community.  I often wonder how many potential misprint collectors have been deterred from the hobby when they met an unwelcome reception to what they felt was a reasonable question or when they wanted to share something they thought was cool.  It's sad to think about, and I've seen it happen.


So you're still frustrated.  What do you do?  Never fear!  I present you with these simple options of what to do when your goat has been gotten:

  1. Politely direct the question asker to the already existing resources that answers their questions.  The key word is 'politely.'  It's really not that difficult to be courteous.  You don't have to bend over backwards with overwhelming kindness, but just don't be an ass.  It really doesn't take much energy.  Sometimes it can even feel good to help others.  Don't feel like expending that tiny bit of extra energy?  Try the next strategies.
  2. Ignore it.  Let it slide.  Roll your eyes and move on.  It turns out that you don't HAVE to let the internet know how you feel.  If you're not going to add anything constructive to the conversation, then don't say anything.  Over time you'll hopefully develop a thicker skin or at least desensitize yourself to the newbs.
  3. Channel the frustration into something productive.  Build a website, write a blog, make some Youtube videos (see a pattern here?), make a Facebook group for people that share your feelings, go to the gym, play with the dog, or really just anything else.  Emotions generate energy, which you can utilize to your advantage.

Personally, I employ each of the above strategies.  When I choose each one is context specific and/or based on my mood.  I've often considered how much leniency to afford the folks who come seeking help.  How much energy should I expect people to put in before I put energy in myself?  That's a question that we each have to answer for ourselves.

I have a few thoughts left to leave you with.  The first is don't let the visible newbness get you down.  It's very easy to color our perceptions based on the content that is most visible.  Constantly seeing the same annoying questions over and over again can lead you to believe that nobody is listening.  Keep in mind what you're not seeing are the people who actually learned something from your efforts.  They're out there and there are probably more of them than you think.  If you're one of the folks who have been helped out by the misprint community, say thanks!  Showing appreciation for our efforts can go a long way.

That's it for now!  I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic.  Have any advice or other strategies to share?  Comment below or send me an email.  Thanks for reading!

A Decline in MTG Quality Assurance?

Currently there is a general perception that the overall quality of Magic cards has been severely declining over the years.  Perhaps this is an arrogant assumption on my part, but I'd wager that the misprint community is probably the most informed sub-culture of the MTG player/collector base when it comes to seeing the complete picture regarding the overall quality of MTG product.  For what it's worth, it is literally our hobby to collect production errors.  Hopefully I can share some of our insights into what has and hasn't shifted in this heated topic.

So...What is quality assurance?


Ok, so what sort of QA system does WotC and the MTG printing facilities have?

Well...they don't really go into too much detail, but here's what Cartamundi's website has to say on the topic.  We also get a very tiny insight into WotC's QA involvement with this article.

From Cartamundi's website.

Source: Building Tariel, WotC

Source: Building Tariel, WotC

Holy crap!  Like nothing should like ever be misprinted or wrong with MTG as long as there’s QA right, dude?

Wrong.  Mistakes are a natural part of production.  The more complicated the production process and the more you produce stuff, the more room there is for mistakes.  ISO:9001 is a standardized QA system that companies (in this case Cartamundi) can cater to their own needs.  What that boils down to is that Cartamundi can choose what is and isn't acceptable for the quality of their products.  As long as they meet their self prescribed quality standards and processes, they can keep their ISO certification.  This is a gross generalization of ISO, but is meant to illustrate that the level and degree of QA is a choice.

Wait a second... You’re saying that printing facilities are CHOOSING to not have 100% perfect product?

Well, sort of.  If they were physically capable of ensuring a 100% as-intended product, they would probably do so as long as it wasn't super expensive.  By setting the acceptable standards lower than 100%, they're being realistic.  Things happen during production.  No machine and no person is perfect.  Sometimes mistakes just get through.  Cartamundi's QA system just insures that it maintains an acceptable margin of error.

But, Jason, I’m seeing tons errors every set release!  So many more than what I used to see.  Surely that means they’ve lowered their standards right?

It's possible, but let's talk about something called Survivorship Bias.  Survivorship bias can be summed up as people's ability to draw incorrect correlations and conclusions based on the visibility of an outcome.  For example; "I'm seeing a ton more misprints than I used to so there must be declining production standards."  The truth is that you can draw any number of conclusions based on the number of misprints you're seeing, and none of them are more correct than than the others (unless you have inside information).

So what other factors can contribute to the perception of there being more misprints?

 I'm glad you asked!

1.  MTG is the most popular it's ever been AND more Magic cards are currently being printed than ever before. 

Let's paint a hypothetical picture where we say 1% of any set's total print run is misprinted.  Set A (nostalgically printed in 2010) has a total print run of 20 million cards (this is a hypothetical scenario with entirely made up numbers, but bear with me) which means we see approximately 200,000 misprints.  Set B (which just came out in 2017) had a 100 million card run which yields 1 million misprints.  Pretty simple math to understand why you're seeing more.  If you look at the data we do have about MTG print run size it actually correlates pretty nicely with the sets we know to have lots of misprints, but also to the severity of misprints in those sets.  Take Fallen Empires as an example.  There was a pretty large jump in production numbers (75mil The Dark > 375mil FE) and as a result FE has some super spicy misprints.

2.  There is a higher level of awareness of the misprint community. 

As of writing this blog post, the Misprints and Rarities Facebook Group has ~28,000 members, ~5,000 of which have joined in the last 6 months.  The more people that are aware of misprints the more people there are who will post them on teh iternets.  No surprise there why you're seeing more of them pop up.

3.  WotC/Hasbro/Cartamundi/The Illuminati (#conspiracyTheories) keep futzing with cards. 

Magic the Gathering is a fluid and living game.  New stuff is being done all the time.  This can be super subtle visual changes to a minor part of the card that you may never notice, to major mechanics that completely change how a MTG card functions.  Every time you add a new element, you add more possibilities for things to go wrong.  It's not just visual or mechanical changes to cards that they've been playing around with either, but I'll address this in the next paragraph.

4.  WotC likes to experiment, gauge the results, and then course correct on the fly. 

This includes the physical makeup of the cards.  We've seen subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) changes in cardstock and foiling processes throughout various product releases.  I don't bring this up to poo poo all over WotC for choosing lower quality cardstock (not really an argument that you can have without insider information) but rather as another element which can induce variance to the printing process, and therefore contribute to the higher population of misprints.

Dilbert gets it...

Dilbert gets it...

Ok, well that's a whole slew of factors that contribute to our perception of WotC's QA, but what's the bottom line here?  What it all comes down to is that it is extremely likely that it's a combination of all of the above.  Thinking that MTG QA standards have plummeted to the point where we need to be frothing-at-the-mouth upset with WotC is a stance that doesn't take into consideration all of the factors.  However, at the same time, we are SEEING more abnormal product than ever before.

Ok, so QA probably hasn’t shifted, but we are seeing more production errors. Does that mean misprints aren’t worth as much anymore?

Technically yes and technically no.  Misprint value, is heavily dependent on severity of the misprint.  The question is, who determines what severity of misprint is valuable and what isn't?  It's based on availability.  Our perception of what is cool and what isn't is based on what we see.  The more of a specific type of misprint we see, the less we'll value it.  In a way, the massive influx of misprints has resulted in collectors acquiring a more refined taste.  We value the more severe (rarer) misprints more.

Well...that about wraps this up.  QA may have shifted slightly, but there are many other factors at work.  What are your thoughts on MTG card quality?  Do you agree or disagree with me.  Let me know in the comments and thanks for reading!

$1 Bids, the dickest of dick moves.

The Misprints and Rarities Facebook group has become the primary marketplace for auctioning off misprints and rarities.  Unlike eBay, the FB group has a tremendous amount of visibility directly to the target audience.  Also unlike eBay, Facebook auctions are a sequential series of non-binding, unregulated comments.  There's an inherit risk when buying and selling on FB, but it's usually a small one since we're a moderated community.  "So what does this have to do with $1 bids, Jason?" you ask.  Well, it's that whole community thing.

I suppose the title of this blog is slightly misleading.  Despite my strong aversion to $1 bids, there is a time and a place for them.  Personally, I believe that place to be on any item that's current bid is less than $5.  After that, is when the dick moves start, and get progressively dickier.  Outbidding by $1 on anything higher than $50 is downright shameful.  Context is key here.  If you outbid a fellow community member by $1 every time they place a bid, it's disrespectful and a waste of their time (it also generates spam level FB notifications), even if their bid is lower than your potential maximum.  In most cases, $1 is not enough of a deterrent for people to fold.  All you're doing is being annoying. 

There are 'strategic' reasons to make $1 bids on auctions.  They mask your potential highest bid, they will save you the most amount of money when they stick, and they put other bidders on tilt.  If your MO is to win auctions for the least amount of money, those are pretty good strategies.  You're welcome to exercise them if you want, but don't pretend that you're not being an asshat to other members when you do that stuff.  If you find yourself not respected by the community at large, don't be surprised.  Misprint collectors are a pretty tight knit community.  Bad reputations will not serve you well in the long run.  If you show respect to other members, you will in turn be respected.

Most sellers set $1 minimum bid increments as a means to prevent dealing in pennies (something that can easily be done by just saying. "Bids must be in whole dollar amounts.").  They also have the added benefit of continually bumping your auction thread.  Higher visibility usually leads to more action and higher end prices on auctions.  This can backfire though.  It doesn't always guarantee you more bidding action.  When members see a post get bumped to the top of the group a million times a day, they start ignoring it.  What you think is helping, can actually hurt you.  Additionally, there are members who are less likely to even bother bidding against the $1 bargain hunters because it's not worth the hassle.  If you want the best way to get solid action on your items, I would recommend using a minimum bid system that escalates in proportion to the current bid.  Here's what that might look like;

  • Minimum bid on cards < $10 is $1
  • Minimum bid on cards < $20 is $2
  • Minimum bid on cards < $30 is $3
  • Minimum bid on cards < $50 is $5
  • Minimum bid on cards < $100 is $10
  • etc, you get the math that's going on here and can fill in all the blanks.

I prefer this over flat % based minimum bid systems because it's very easy for bidders to calculate what the minimum bid on an item is.  This is a great idea for sellers because it can net you HIGHER prices when true bidding wars break out.  Bidders will be forced to be very thoughtful about their bids, and it will make things smoother in the long run.

If you want to employ the $1 bidding strategy, go ahead, but know that you are doing so at the cost of a negative impact to your reputation in the community.  There are a lot of collectors who don't share that sentiment, but there are also a lot of collectors who feel the same as I do.  If you want that sort of action, go to eBay and save us all the headache.  Facebook is not optimized for auctioning, but it's what we've got.  I'd really appreciated it if you stopped being assholes.  "If you can't beat them, join them."  Fuck that.  I have integrity. /endRant


The Misconceptions of Determining Value

"It's not worth anything if you're not selling it."

"In order to determine the value you need to auction it."

"This type of misprint is worth 1.5 times the normal value of the card"

I'm going to do my best to not make this a rant, but statements like this are a huge pet peeve of mine.  They are not true and they are continually offered as advice to people who are looking for estimates and information about their misprints.

It turns out that people have been thinking and talking about the concept of value for a very long time.  I'm not an economist, but there's some pretty intriguing Wikipedia entries which you can check out here and here.  To avoid getting into a theoretical or philosophical debate on the concept of value, I'll just use the definition:

From; Edited to remove non-relevant definition #1 from image.

From  Edited to remove non-relevant definition #1 from image.

Statements that suggest that a misprint has no value unless it is being sold are entirely contradictory to the very definition of the word.  Value is a representation of potential.  It's equally dependent on the willingness of the buyer to pay a specific price as it is for a seller to sell for a specific price.  A lot of times an auction is actually a really poor way to determine the value of an object.  Sometimes an auction goes unnoticed and an item goes for less than it would had it proper visibility.  Other times there can be a bidding war which can escalate way past the historical market price for an item due to stubborn competitiveness.  Black and white representations of market value and supply vs demand are sound theories, but the reality we live in is covered in greys.  I really like the following paragraph from the wikipedia article:

Note that economic value is not the same as market price, nor is economic value the same thing as market value. If a consumer is willing to buy a good, it implies that the customer places a higher value on the good than the market price. The difference between the value to the consumer and the market price is called "consumer surplus"[1]. It is easy to see situations where the actual value is considerably larger than the market price: purchase of drinking water is one example.

If you've read my article about determining the value of misprints you already know that there are several factors to consider when appraising a misprint.  The ability to accurately appraise misprints is something that requires experience, skill, and dedicated and continual observation of the market.  Applying standard multipliers to types of misprints is an exercise in futility for all of the reasons and definitions of value mentioned above.

Misprint economics aside, using one of the three quotes mentioned at the beginning of this blog post, or any variation is simply a dick move.  People are requesting information.  A lot of the time their intent is to sell and they're looking to be informed about the product in which they're trying to sell so they can feel that they're making good decisions.  Throwing flawed and generic responses at them is not only unhelpful, but can also pressure people into making bad decisions.  It's bad...just don't do it.  No, really.  Please stop.  If you don't agree, feel free to leave a comment here explaining why or send me an email!

Happy 1st Birthday!

Holy crap, has it already been an entire year?  Yes.  Yes it has.  One year ago today I released to the masses (you guys).  The response has been incredible!  I thought it would be really cool to share some data in celebration of our first year:

In one year, over 15 THOUSAND unique visitors have checked out articles on!

This is the number of sessions per month.  It's been growing over time, which means that we've been getting more popular!  Awesome!

People from each country highlighted blue have visited!  That's 116 different countries!!!!!!

These are the top 10 countries that visit the site.  Not on the list?  Step up your game and visit more often!

The beginner's guide to misprints and rarities is more popular than the website's homepage!  There's also a typo in the URL which I've declined to fix since I don't want to mess with my analytics data!

It's been an awesome year and I look forward to making more content for you guys in the next year.  I'll keep releasing more episodes of Misprint Mailbrag and have a bunch of other videos in the works so be sure to subscribe to my youtube channel!  It's really been an honor to make even such a minuscule splash in the great ocean of the internet, and it wouldn't be possible without all of you.  Thank you to everyone who's helped me build the site, and thank you guys for deeming me worthy enough for you to take the time to read my words.  Happy Birthday!

Ixalan DFC's aren't and won't be worth SQUAT!

Ugh, thanks WoTC...

So you may have seen this recent announcement published by Wizards of the Coast admitting to the use of the incorrect cardstock on an undisclosed amount of dual faced cards (DFC for short) in Ixalan.

As a result of this announcement, the misprint community has seen the inevitable flood of people asking if their cards are misprints and flooding marketplaces like eBay with all these new "misprints" they've opened.


Even worse, there are people with significant youtube followings, who know little about misprints, spreading misinformation by directly comparing this mishap to Summer Magic!


I'm here to set the record straight:


If we look at eBay right now we can see that people are hoping that misprint collectors will buy these magical new misprints at exorbitant premiums.  There's a small flood of flashlight photos and "Ixalan Misprint" listing titles all over eBay,

Holy crap!  Only $500 for a playset of misprinted Growing Rites?  Sign me up!  **even harder facepalm**

So are these cards even selling?  Admittedly, a few of them are, but not for the insane prices that some people are putting them at.  If you've read my article about how to figure out the value of your misprint, you'll recall that I brought up supply and demand.  Any demand for these cards is going to dry up very quickly.  The types of collectors who want to own a few or all of these most likely have already got them.  The more experienced collectors won't be in a rush though and if they don't have them yet will wait for the over-hype to pass before picking them up.  What I'm saying is that there's LITTLE TO NO DEMAND for these cards.  A few have sold on eBay at slightly higher prices, but that ship has sailed.

Yes...2 listings got lucky, but don't expect that to be the norm.

So now that we've established a baseline for demand, let's talk about supply.  For WotC to make a PA about the error means that they are expecting multiple people to run into these and they needed to acknowledge them to avoid any potential competitive REL issues.  From that, we can infer that a significant portion of product has been affected.  This is supported by the fact of how many people are finding these cards now.  It's safe to say that this is a very common error.

If you wan't to figure out the price of a very common production error over the long term, you need to take a look at the other very common errors that have popped up throughout the history of magic.  I'm talking about the hairy Runeswords, the shifted Gaea's Touch, Alpha Unsummon, and the myriad of other similar examples throughout magic's history

Let's compare our Ixalan DFC to one of the more valuable recurring misprints. 

Unlike the Lost Vale to its right and the other 3 aforementioned common misprints the Serra Angel/Time elemental is visually stunning.  Anyone who knows either of the 2 cards or anything about magic can immediately tell that there's something wrong.  To top it off Serra Angel is a very collectible card.  There are reasons that this card commands a $75+ price-tag.

The Lost Vale on the other hand requires a flashlight to even verify that it is a misprint.  Otherwise it doesn't stand out at all.  It's arguably less noticeable than the hairy runesword.  People are also unsure about if these cards will be considered marked due to the tangible difference from normal cards when shuffling.  That's why it will never carry a significant premium.

I hope after reading this that I've cleared up any potential confusion about the Ixalan cardstock issue.  I need your help.  Take this blog and share it.  Stop the rumors about DFC's being valuable misprints from spreading further.  The misprint community has become a bit of a dumping ground. Normal MTG players are opening minor misprints more than ever and because of misconceptions about what is collectible, we see floods of cards that are not.  This may not seem like a big deal, but it's damaging to the health of our hobby.  Imagine that you're watching your favorite tv show, and every 7 seconds a trailer for a show that you may be interested in interrupts your viewing experience.  It'll get very old very quickly.  Thank you for helping me spread the word!